World Renown Heart Surgeon Speaks Out On What Really Causes Heart Disease
We physicians with all our training, knowledge and authority often acquire a rather large ego that tends to make it difficult to admit we are wrong. So, here it is. I freely admit to being wrong.. As a heart surgeon with 25 years experience, having performed over 5,000 open-heart surgeries, today is my day to right the wrong with medical and scientific fact.
I trained for many years with other prominent physicians labelled “opinion makers.” Bombarded with scientific literature, continually attending education seminars, we opinion makers insisted heart disease resulted from the simple fact of elevated blood cholesterol.
The only accepted therapy was prescribing medications to lower cholesterol and a diet that severely restricted fat intake. The latter of course we insisted would lower cholesterol and heart disease. Deviations from these recommendations were considered heresy and could quite possibly result in malpractice.
It Is Not Working!
These recommendations are no longer scientifically or morally defensible. The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.
The long-established dietary recommendations have created epidemics of obesity and diabetes, the consequences of which dwarf any historical plague in terms of mortality, human suffering and dire economic consequences.
Despite the fact that 25% of the population takes expensive statin medications and despite the fact we have reduced the fat content of our diets, more Americans will die this year of heart disease than ever before.
Statistics from the American Heart Association show that 75 million Americans currently suffer from heart disease, 20 million have diabetes and 57 million have pre-diabetes. These disorders are affecting younger and younger people in greater numbers every year.
Simply stated, without inflammation being present in the body, there is no way that cholesterol would accumulate in the wall of the blood vessel and cause heart disease and strokes. Without inflammation, cholesterol would move freely throughout the body as nature intended. It is inflammation that causes cholesterol to become trapped.
Inflammation is not complicated -- it is quite simply your body's natural defence to a foreign invader such as a bacteria, toxin or virus. The cycle of inflammation is perfect in how it protects your body from these bacterial and viral invaders. However, if we chronically expose the body to injury by toxins or foods the human body was never designed to process, a condition occurs called chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is just as harmful as acute inflammation is beneficial.
What thoughtful person would willfully expose himself repeatedly to foods or other substances that are known to cause injury to the body? Well,smokers perhaps, but at least they made that choice willfully.
The rest of us have simply followed the recommended mainstream diet that is low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, not knowing we were causing repeated injury to our blood vessels. This repeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.
Let me repeat that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine.
What are the biggest culprits of chronic inflammation? Quite simply, they are the overload of simple, highly processed carbohydrates (sugar, flour and all the products made from them) and the excess consumption of omega-6 vegetable oils like soybean, corn and sunflower that are found in many processed foods.
Take a moment to visualize rubbing a stiff brush repeatedly over soft skin until it becomes quite red and nearly bleeding. you kept this up several times a day, every day for five years. If you could tolerate this painful brushing, you would have a bleeding, swollen infected area that became worse with each repeated injury. This is a good way to visualize the inflammatory process that could be going on in your body right now.
Regardless of where the inflammatory process occurs, externally or internally, it is the same. I have peered inside thousands upon thousands of arteries. A diseased artery looks as if someone took a brush and scrubbed repeatedly against its wall. Several times a day, every day, the foods we eat create small injuries compounding into more injuries, causing the body to respond continuously and appropriately with inflammation.
While we savor the tantalizing taste of a sweet roll, our bodies respond alarmingly as if a foreign invader arrived declaring war. Foods loaded with sugars and simple carbohydrates, or processed with omega-6 oils for long shelf life have been the mainstay of the American diet for six decades. These foods have been slowly poisoning everyone.
How does eating a simple sweet roll create a cascade of inflammation to make you sick?
Imagine spilling syrup on your keyboard and you have a visual of what occurs inside the cell. When we consume simple carbohydrates such as sugar, blood sugar rises rapidly. In response, your pancreas secretes insulin whose primary purpose is to drive sugar into each cell where it is stored for energy. If the cell is full and does not need glucose, it is rejected to avoid extra sugar gumming up the works.
When your full cells reject the extra glucose, blood sugar rises producing more insulin and the glucose converts to stored fat.
What does all this have to do with inflammation? Blood sugar is controlled in a very narrow range. Extra sugar molecules attach to a variety of proteins that in turn injure the blood vessel wall. This repeated injury to the blood vessel wall sets off inflammation. When you spike your blood sugar level several times a day, every day, it is exactly like taking sandpaper to the inside of your delicate blood vessels.
While you may not be able to see it, rest assured it is there. I saw it in over 5,000 surgical patients spanning 25 years who all shared one common denominator -- inflammation in their arteries.
Let’s get back to the sweet roll. That innocent looking goody not only contains sugars, it is baked in one of many omega-6 oils such as soybean. Chips and fries are soaked in soybean oil; processed foods are manufactured with omega-6 oils for longer shelf life. While omega-6’s are essential -they are part of every cell membrane controlling what goes in and out of the cell -- they must be in the correct balance with omega-3’s.
If the balance shifts by consuming excessive omega-6, the cell membrane produces chemicals called cytokines that directly cause inflammation.
Today’s mainstream American diet has produced an extreme imbalance of these two fats. The ratio of imbalance ranges from 15:1 to as high as 30:1 in favor of omega-6. That’s a tremendous amount of cytokines causing inflammation. In today’s food environment, a 3:1 ratio would be optimal and healthy.
To make matters worse, the excess weight you are carrying from eating these foods creates overloaded fat cells that pour out large quantities of pro-inflammatory chemicals that add to the injury caused by having high blood sugar. The process that began with a sweet roll turns into a vicious cycle over time that creates heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes and finally, Alzheimer’s disease, as the inflammatory process continues unabated.
There is no escaping the fact that the more we consume prepared and processed foods, the more we trip the inflammation switch little by little each day. The human body cannot process, nor was it designed to consume, foods packed with sugars and soaked in omega-6 oils.
There is but one answer to quieting inflammation, and that is returning to foods closer to their natural state. To build muscle, eat more protein. Choose carbohydrates that are very complex such as colorful fruits and vegetables. Cut down on or eliminate inflammation- causing omega-6 fats like corn and soybean oil and the processed foods that are made from them.
One tablespoon of corn oil contains 7,280 mg of omega-6; soybean contains 6,940 mg. Instead, use olive oil or butter from grass-fed beef.
Animal fats contain less than 20% omega-6 and are much less likely to cause inflammation than the supposedly healthy oils labelled polyunsaturated. Forget the “science” that has been drummed into your head for decades. The science that saturated fat alone causes heart disease is non-existent. The science that saturated fat raises blood cholesterol is also very weak. Since we now know that cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease, the concern about saturated fat is even more absurd today.
The cholesterol theory led to the no-fat, low-fat recommendations that in turn created the very foods now causing an epidemic of inflammation. Mainstream medicine made a terrible mistake when it advised people to avoid saturated fat in favor of foods high in omega-6 fats. We now have an epidemic of arterial inflammation leading to heart disease and other silent killers.
What you can do is choose whole foods your grandmother served and not those your mom turned to as grocery store aisles filled with manufactured foods. By eliminating inflammatory foods and adding essential nutrients from fresh unprocessed food, you will reverse years of damage in your arteries and throughout your body from consuming the typical American diet.
Dr. Dwight Lundell is the past Chief of Staff and Chief of Surgery at Banner Heart Hospital , Mesa , AZ. His private practice, Cardiac Care Center was in Mesa, AZ. Recently Dr. Lundell left surgery to focus on the nutritional treatment of heart disease. He is the founder of Healthy Humans Foundation that promotes human health with a focus on helping large corporations promote wellness. He is also the author of The Cure for Heart Disease and The Great Cholesterol Lie.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Friday, March 9, 2012
ALL OUT STRONG
So many clients come in more than injured or overweight, they come in wounded. By a lot of things. If you can overcome this, no one will call you lucky, but everyone will call you strong.
Labels:
Articles,
Inspiration,
Mantras
HOW MUCH IS YOUR HEALTH HEREDITY AND HOW MUCH IS IT LIFESTYLE
A lot of people believe their health is not in their hands. That it's in the hands of their genes and whatever genes they were born with, is their lot in life. Some people were born with "lucky" genes (meaning lean and athletic) and some were born with "bad" genes (sickly and overweight).
If somehow they are overweight or sick or get an illness, it was because they inherited that gene.
This doesn't explain certain things. Like why incidence of things such as childhood cancer or PCOS are going up dramatically when it was almost unheard of years ago. Or why certain races (that are also in certain economic ranges) have a high incidence of heart disease when there isn't the same problem in their country of origin?
Or when an adopted person develops lung cancer or diabetes, the same as their adoptive parents did. In the instance of lung cancer, is it genetics? Or was it that their adoptive parent passed on the habit of smoking to their child. Or with diabetes was it that the parent passed down their love of sweets to their children? Genes are not the only things that are passed down. Just like nature vs. nurture in personality building, environment plays a huge role in health as well.
We can control the expression of our genes. Gene expression basically means, deciding which genes turn on or off. Dr. Arjun Raj (Molecular Biologist, University of Pennsylvania) says this is done through RNA. We can express our genes throughout our life, and then pass down these genes to our children. This is how identical twins are not truly identical.
Just the simple act of controlling how we breathe can affect gene expression according to Harvard Researcher Herbert Benson.
Exercise does an even better job.
Genes are not our destiny and we can constantly reprogram them. So while your genes are fixed, the expression of them, meaning the amount of protein they cause to be made or whether its turned on or off is dependent on the environment and circumstances surrounding those genes.
From Mark's Daily Apple:
Ultimately no matter how well we live and how much we exercise, bad things can and will happen. Does that mean we shouldn't try? No. If we can't prevent, at least we can increase our health and life so that no matter what illnesses may strike, we are healthy enough to overcome them. Think of your life in terms of points. Exercise, diet, positive thinking, and a healthy lifestyle increase your life points. Surgeries and things such as chemotherapy diminish your health points in an effort to cure you. The more life points you have, the better chance you have of surviving, or just living longer. I've known several martial artists who were in and still in incredible health who had cancer come over and over again in their life. Each time they did chemo and survived and revived their health. I don't many people who could survive that many bouts with cancer or that many rounds of chemo. They were in that incredible of a shape and their life points were that high. If they never had cancer, they may live to be over a hundred. They may still yet.
I know people who from routine surgery are out and about after a week. I also know people who could have the same surgery and be in bed for months. I have my own family members who take such poor care of themselves, if any major illness or surgery is required, I don't know if they have the starting health to survive it. I'm sure you know people like that in your own family as well, you look at them and you worry if they can even walk away from a mild car accident. My own father was diagnosed with cancer over a year ago and it was found at stage 4. He is still alive. In that same time two of his friends (my dad is in his late 80s) got diagnosed with cancer after he did, they had stage 1, and are already dead. Every day my father is alive, is a miracle to me.
People blame their genetics for a lot, but 99% of us have great genetics. Through evolution and natural selection, most of the weak human genes died off and we the modern humans are the best versions of our family's genetics and bloodline. If you fed any other animal the stuff you have eaten, put in your body, smoked, drank, stress, lack of sleep, and everything else, it would be dead by now. The fact that most of us are still alive and continue to be alive after putting ourselves through so much is a testament to our genes. If you did all that, and all that happened to you is that you got fat, and your body continues to get fat to make sure you stay alive and don't die of toxic blood sugar, you have pretty damn good genes.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
If somehow they are overweight or sick or get an illness, it was because they inherited that gene.
This doesn't explain certain things. Like why incidence of things such as childhood cancer or PCOS are going up dramatically when it was almost unheard of years ago. Or why certain races (that are also in certain economic ranges) have a high incidence of heart disease when there isn't the same problem in their country of origin?
Or when an adopted person develops lung cancer or diabetes, the same as their adoptive parents did. In the instance of lung cancer, is it genetics? Or was it that their adoptive parent passed on the habit of smoking to their child. Or with diabetes was it that the parent passed down their love of sweets to their children? Genes are not the only things that are passed down. Just like nature vs. nurture in personality building, environment plays a huge role in health as well.
We can control the expression of our genes. Gene expression basically means, deciding which genes turn on or off. Dr. Arjun Raj (Molecular Biologist, University of Pennsylvania) says this is done through RNA. We can express our genes throughout our life, and then pass down these genes to our children. This is how identical twins are not truly identical.
Just the simple act of controlling how we breathe can affect gene expression according to Harvard Researcher Herbert Benson.
Exercise does an even better job.
Genes are not our destiny and we can constantly reprogram them. So while your genes are fixed, the expression of them, meaning the amount of protein they cause to be made or whether its turned on or off is dependent on the environment and circumstances surrounding those genes.
From Mark's Daily Apple:
"Diet, exercise, exposure to toxic chemicals (or fresh air), medicines, even the thoughts you think (which generate actual chemical signals) all influence gene expression – positively and/or negatively, depending on the choice. Eat a diet that is high in sugar, and gene expression moves in a direction that produces more insulin, that shuts off insulin receptors, that down-regulates lipase and other enzymes involved in fat-burning, that increases pro-inflammatory cytokines, etc. When you change to a diet low in sugars and rich in healthy fats, those or other genes are directed to reduce inflammatory expression, down-regulate insulin-producing metabolic machinery, up-regulate insulin receptors and rebuild cell membranes to reflect the presence of better building materials (omega 3 fatty acids, etc.). Research in gene expression is exploding right now and is examining both the impact of environmental factors and the promise of epigenetic therapies. The connection between insulin resistance and genetic expression (particularly in relation to exercise) was raised in last week’s comments. Diet and toxin exposure have been shown to influence gene expression in laboratory studies."Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression or cellular phenotype caused by mechanisms other than changes in the underlying DNA sequence. Duke University’s Randy Jirtle, Ph.D says, "the epigenome would be like the software that tells the computer when to work, how to work and how much." The computer being our genes.
The interaction between lifestyle choices and gene expression goes on every second of every day you’re alive. You are literally rebuilding yourself all the time. That’s the message of hope that the Primal Blueprint offers. Even if you have so-called markers for “defective” genes, that doesn’t mean they will be expressed. Gene interaction is such that environmental factors can potentially allow for someone with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (associated with a very high risk for breast cancer) to never get breast cancer if those and related genes are properly controlled through environment. On the other hand, a woman with no risk factors can still get breast cancer if she directs gene expression towards pro-inflammatory pathways, then down-regulates other parts of her immune system.
As I mentioned last week, most of today’s genome investigation centers on SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that predispose the possessor to a particular condition (cancer, heart disease, obesity, diabetes, arthritis, etc). I’ve always said that a predisposition is not your final destiny. Even aging itself is highly influenced by gene expression over time. In the course of a lifetime, stem cells divide to repair injury (e.g. inflammation). In doing so, the cells are continually aged. The more the cells have to repair, the faster a person ages. This, of course, is a manifestation of gene expression."
Ultimately no matter how well we live and how much we exercise, bad things can and will happen. Does that mean we shouldn't try? No. If we can't prevent, at least we can increase our health and life so that no matter what illnesses may strike, we are healthy enough to overcome them. Think of your life in terms of points. Exercise, diet, positive thinking, and a healthy lifestyle increase your life points. Surgeries and things such as chemotherapy diminish your health points in an effort to cure you. The more life points you have, the better chance you have of surviving, or just living longer. I've known several martial artists who were in and still in incredible health who had cancer come over and over again in their life. Each time they did chemo and survived and revived their health. I don't many people who could survive that many bouts with cancer or that many rounds of chemo. They were in that incredible of a shape and their life points were that high. If they never had cancer, they may live to be over a hundred. They may still yet.
I know people who from routine surgery are out and about after a week. I also know people who could have the same surgery and be in bed for months. I have my own family members who take such poor care of themselves, if any major illness or surgery is required, I don't know if they have the starting health to survive it. I'm sure you know people like that in your own family as well, you look at them and you worry if they can even walk away from a mild car accident. My own father was diagnosed with cancer over a year ago and it was found at stage 4. He is still alive. In that same time two of his friends (my dad is in his late 80s) got diagnosed with cancer after he did, they had stage 1, and are already dead. Every day my father is alive, is a miracle to me.
People blame their genetics for a lot, but 99% of us have great genetics. Through evolution and natural selection, most of the weak human genes died off and we the modern humans are the best versions of our family's genetics and bloodline. If you fed any other animal the stuff you have eaten, put in your body, smoked, drank, stress, lack of sleep, and everything else, it would be dead by now. The fact that most of us are still alive and continue to be alive after putting ourselves through so much is a testament to our genes. If you did all that, and all that happened to you is that you got fat, and your body continues to get fat to make sure you stay alive and don't die of toxic blood sugar, you have pretty damn good genes.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
INSULIN, HORMONES, AND WEIGHT GAIN
What you thought about weight gain is probably wrong. Yes calories is one side of the picture but not the whole picture itself. What tells the body to let's say keep the calories and in others tells them to get rid of it as waste? What tells the body to use it, what tells the body to store it? Calories does not explain that. Why do the obese get diabetes so often? Calories does not explain that. Hormones and insulin response does. So why did you really get fat?
Labels:
Articles,
Diet,
Getting Fat,
Health,
Videos
THOUGHTS ON LIFESTYLE
Thought of the day: What if everything you thought about diet and exercise was wrong? I will expand on this idea over the course of this blog.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
EPIC BABY YOGA FAIL
One of the most dangerous things I have seen with a child. I can't believe people from Europe fly to her seminars to learn how to do this. She even swings the baby between her legs like a kettlebell. It is not a doll but a real baby. This is not a joke.
WHAT IS SEXY AND WHAT IS SKINNY
Saw this ad for VitaminWater Zero XXX (zero calories, yes I get it you are implying it will make you skinny like this girl and XXX means sexy. Sure.).
Is skinny and sexy one and the same?
I post a lot of pictures, some sexy, some may be deemed insensitive. Some that seems to make fun of obesity. I felt compelled to post this pic because to me this picture is a loaded. Representing a lot of things. Societal views on femininity, sexuality, etc. This is what a lot of people want, what a lot of girls want, what some guys want. A skinny chick. But to me she seems too skinny and shapeless. Almost like a skinny boy. But media and print like this is telling us, this is what our ideal is and that shapes us. I've heard my guy friends tell me the reason they like Asian girls is because they perceive them to be stick skinny, formless.
It reminds me of ads I've seen in the past where they hire young looking models and sort of shoot it in a way where it looks like kiddie porn. This kind of brought on a similar feeling. Like forbidden sexy or something.
If a large women has a waist the same size as her hips, shes deemed unattractive. If a skinny women has a waist same size as her hips, shes hot. But usually when the hip and waist are same size, that is classically a man's square build. But if she is large, you say she looks like a man. If she is skinny how come she doesn't look like a boy? A boy is a smaller version of a man right?
Yes it is not healthy to be too large. But being small doesn't necessarily define femininity either. And sometimes women try to get too small and risk their health.
Skinny looks good with clothes on. FIT LOOKS GREAT WITHOUT IT.
Just a thought. What are your thoughts?
Is skinny and sexy one and the same?
I post a lot of pictures, some sexy, some may be deemed insensitive. Some that seems to make fun of obesity. I felt compelled to post this pic because to me this picture is a loaded. Representing a lot of things. Societal views on femininity, sexuality, etc. This is what a lot of people want, what a lot of girls want, what some guys want. A skinny chick. But to me she seems too skinny and shapeless. Almost like a skinny boy. But media and print like this is telling us, this is what our ideal is and that shapes us. I've heard my guy friends tell me the reason they like Asian girls is because they perceive them to be stick skinny, formless.
It reminds me of ads I've seen in the past where they hire young looking models and sort of shoot it in a way where it looks like kiddie porn. This kind of brought on a similar feeling. Like forbidden sexy or something.
If a large women has a waist the same size as her hips, shes deemed unattractive. If a skinny women has a waist same size as her hips, shes hot. But usually when the hip and waist are same size, that is classically a man's square build. But if she is large, you say she looks like a man. If she is skinny how come she doesn't look like a boy? A boy is a smaller version of a man right?
Yes it is not healthy to be too large. But being small doesn't necessarily define femininity either. And sometimes women try to get too small and risk their health.
Skinny looks good with clothes on. FIT LOOKS GREAT WITHOUT IT.
Just a thought. What are your thoughts?
SALTED SALAD
Saw someone dump 2 packets of salt then the whole container of ranch into their salad. What was the point of ordering salad then? And who puts salt on salad?
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
MY INTERVIEW FOR A NEW PERSONAL TRAINING AND FITNESS BOOK
An excerpt from my interview for the upcoming book "The Cutting Edge of Fitness."
FULL NAME: Sam Yang
COMPANY NAME: All Out Effort
TITLE/POSITION WITH COMPANY: Owner and Founder
Please tell us about your company:
Taking the best from the elite levels of athletics and martial arts, to train the regular public.
Selecting a trainer without personal recommendations is difficult. What should people look out for when choosing their trainer?
Check to see what their reputation is, if there are any testimonials. Also check to see the substance of their approach. Look through all the glamorous pictures and hype and see if there is any concrete approach and principles the trainer is using. Also see if they offer an assessment. Do not choose any trainer who will train you from day one. Make sure they assess you first. If not, it's like trying to get somewhere without a map, and without knowing where your starting point is. If they can get you in shape, I assure you it's purely by accident. For me it is something I offer for free because I benefit from it as well. It's a chance to gauge if we get a long or not. A good trainer won't just train anyone. The trainer has a right to be choosy because they are about to go into a collaboration with you to get you to your goals. Both parties need to feel good about it. Why take your money if you or the trainer aren't sure yet if this is going to work? If not, it may be a sign of desperation or a hunt for sales.
Do your homework and take your time and try multiple trainers out and compare and see who made the most sense and who's approach fit what you were looking for. Also go into each meeting with a precise goal. Make sure the trainer completely understands your goal and even tries to help you flesh it out more. The difference between people who succeed and people who don't is the difference between abstract goals and clearly defined goals.
Another insider tip, see if the trainer says anything about your shoes or recommends a certain shoe to you. I know it sounds odd but the top fitness professionals will likely recommend minimalist shoes. Strength starts from the feet up and in Chinese medicine there is also another saying, "you die from the feet up." There is a lot of truth to that and a lot of good trainers will want you to feel the ground. Imagine trying to lift anything or create any power with padded gloves on your hands? Also how can you ever maintain a neutral spine or maintain posture if your always on a lift (AKA big shoes). If they have no opinion or tell you big bulky shoes are good for you, they know just as much as you do.
Are bodybuilding titles or numerous certification letters after the trainer’s name proof that they are a good choice to help a person lose weight and get healthier?
Body building titles only matter if you are specifically looking to train for a body building competition. If not, it's not important. What is important are certifications. See if it's from a reputable certifying body like NSCA or NASM (or any certification that requires a college degree). See if they have duplicate certifications or have moved on to specific certifications. If they have a personal training certification from 3 different organizations then it is a bit redundant. Specialized certifications such as strength and conditioning, USAW, nutrition, corrective exercise, Russian kettlebell, and many others. Also degrees in physiology or kinesiology are a plus. Make sure you look up what the letters stand for. Some people will list things that are not certifications but are classes they took, or conferences they've been to, or list the name of organization they belong to as if they were letters to a certification. Sometimes people will list designations or degrees they have, look it up to see if it's in the world of fitness. People will list a designation in an unrelated field, but your assumption will be that their degree is related to fitness.
Some will tell you it's not about certifications but experience. There is some truth to that but at the same time would you trust your doctor if they only had 2 years of schooling total, never got their MD but has a lot of experience? If fitness truly is a science, than education does matter. Also a lack of seeking further accreditation is a sign that they are no longer up to date on current trends nor are they really curious or interested in learning more. This is when you get into people making up their own training science. Just because I don't like physics and no longer want to learn about it, doesn't mean I can go make up my own physics system. Experience though is very important in the trainer's ability to coach and motivate.
What is the "fat burning zone" that trainers often refer to?
Fat burning zone means nothing. It's often used because of the misunderstanding of the term. There's a lot of things trainers say that are based on myth, this being one. People think that when you are in this "zone," you burn more fat. This is not true. The fat burning zone relies on extended periods of low intensity exercise. The energy you use will be a form of carbs and fats, measure by calories. Well in the fat burning zone, you burn very little total calories. In the ratio of carbs and fat burned, you may have a high ratio of fat burned at this zone in comparison to high intensity exercise. In higher intensities, you burn more calories, and you also burn more fat. The ratio of fat compared to carbs burned though will be lower than in the fat burning zone. So for example in the fat burning zone, I can burn let's say 1 apple and 1 orange. 50% of the energy I burned was an orange. If I did a higher intensity work out, I would have burned 5 apples and 3 oranges. Which is 38% but I burned 2 more oranges than I did in the fat burning zone. So I burn more fat in higher intensity work outs. Fact. Not only that but you are burning more carbs, which may also later on turn into fat if left unchecked.
Best analogy is hibernation in animals. They live off their fat reserves. Get fat in the summer and sleep in winter. The reason they can survive so long without food is, they burn very little energy during this time because they are sleeping. Epitome of fat burning zone. Would you recommend sleeping as the best form of weight loss though?
Is there a difference between "cardio" and "aerobic"? If there is, what's the difference?
A term often used interchangeably but can sometimes mean 2 different things. Aerobic means you are expending energy in the presence of oxygen. Oxygen being the key factor. Cardio could mean cardiorespiratory, meaning the same thing as aerobic and based on the health of your lungs and your body's ability to send oxygen through its system. But most often they mean cardiovascular, meaning increasing your heart rate and the health of your vascular system.
How can people tell if they're doing enough exercise or exercising intensely enough?
You will see it in the results. If you train with intensity and frequency, then you are doing your job in the gym. You may however not be doing your job with your diet and your sleep. Especially on the weekends.
Why is it that, no matter how much cardio some people do, they still can't lose weight?
Weight loss has 3 factors, hormonal response, caloric burn, and metabolism. Your body's ability to burn calories is directly linked to how much muscle mass you have. If you have very little muscle mass, what are you really using to burn the calories? Just doing cardio would not be the most efficient method. Creating muscle mass first would be the better investment. Muscle burns calories just existing. It's why people who have a higher muscle mass percentage just burn more calories doing nothing. Muscle burns more calories than fat, you would be wise to take the extra time to build it up. It's why often times men have an easier time losing weight, because they have more muscle mass so it's easier to burn the calories. They are also more apt to lift weights than women are.
Hormones also signal your body to use fat as a fuel, and tells your body to speed up it's metabolism. This will be affected by sleep, mood, stress, diet, exercise, and frequency of exercise.
Is there an "ideal" time of day to work out?
It's really based on preference, but morning would be the most optimal time. It is prior to any stress, loss of energy, and a morning work out will keep your metabolism up for the rest of the day.
Is there any true benefit to warming up, cooling down, or stretching before or after exercising? If there is, why are these things important?
The benefits of those things are mainly in injury prevention and to minimize shock to your body. It may also help to get your mind ready for the work out to come. You should never static stretch prior to a work out but only after, instead opt for dynamic stretches or mobility drills. Never make your warm up too intense as well, it may ruin your strength for the actual work out and make your overall work out less productive. Why is injury prevention important? Well it's only important if you are planning to work out for an extended period of your life. If you don't mind hurting yourself by week 2, then go ahead and forget the mobility and stretches.
If you are training with a professional, is your diet still important?
Yes. Always. There is never a time your fuel source is not important.
It seems like there is a constant stream of conflicting nutrition information. How can we simplify our diet and move towards our health and fitness goals?
Start asking yourself, how were we genetically designed to eat? Humans survived and thrived better than every other species not because we are the fittest or strongest, but because we are the most efficient. So are you eating efficiently? For your stomach or blood or immune system or hormone? It's not good enough to eat with moderation or balance, you must be efficient. So what does that mean? I think that's a lifelong journey in discovery. But start with this, before you put anything in your mouth, even if it's a sports bar, ask yourself this, your genetics that took thousands of years to develop, does it know what this sports bar is? Is it even adapted to eat it? How long has that bar been around? How long have humans been around?
How important are the mental aspects in improving health and fitness?
Exercise is part of it, diet is a lot of it, lifestyle a huge part of it. Your mental approach is what brings it all together. Without a good mental game, it will all fall apart. Do you want to be the captain of your destiny or the pawn of fate? So where is your mental game then, is it strong or have you never thought about it?
About Coach Sam:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
FULL NAME: Sam Yang
COMPANY NAME: All Out Effort
TITLE/POSITION WITH COMPANY: Owner and Founder
Please tell us about your company:
Taking the best from the elite levels of athletics and martial arts, to train the regular public.
Selecting a trainer without personal recommendations is difficult. What should people look out for when choosing their trainer?
Check to see what their reputation is, if there are any testimonials. Also check to see the substance of their approach. Look through all the glamorous pictures and hype and see if there is any concrete approach and principles the trainer is using. Also see if they offer an assessment. Do not choose any trainer who will train you from day one. Make sure they assess you first. If not, it's like trying to get somewhere without a map, and without knowing where your starting point is. If they can get you in shape, I assure you it's purely by accident. For me it is something I offer for free because I benefit from it as well. It's a chance to gauge if we get a long or not. A good trainer won't just train anyone. The trainer has a right to be choosy because they are about to go into a collaboration with you to get you to your goals. Both parties need to feel good about it. Why take your money if you or the trainer aren't sure yet if this is going to work? If not, it may be a sign of desperation or a hunt for sales.
Do your homework and take your time and try multiple trainers out and compare and see who made the most sense and who's approach fit what you were looking for. Also go into each meeting with a precise goal. Make sure the trainer completely understands your goal and even tries to help you flesh it out more. The difference between people who succeed and people who don't is the difference between abstract goals and clearly defined goals.
Another insider tip, see if the trainer says anything about your shoes or recommends a certain shoe to you. I know it sounds odd but the top fitness professionals will likely recommend minimalist shoes. Strength starts from the feet up and in Chinese medicine there is also another saying, "you die from the feet up." There is a lot of truth to that and a lot of good trainers will want you to feel the ground. Imagine trying to lift anything or create any power with padded gloves on your hands? Also how can you ever maintain a neutral spine or maintain posture if your always on a lift (AKA big shoes). If they have no opinion or tell you big bulky shoes are good for you, they know just as much as you do.
Are bodybuilding titles or numerous certification letters after the trainer’s name proof that they are a good choice to help a person lose weight and get healthier?
Body building titles only matter if you are specifically looking to train for a body building competition. If not, it's not important. What is important are certifications. See if it's from a reputable certifying body like NSCA or NASM (or any certification that requires a college degree). See if they have duplicate certifications or have moved on to specific certifications. If they have a personal training certification from 3 different organizations then it is a bit redundant. Specialized certifications such as strength and conditioning, USAW, nutrition, corrective exercise, Russian kettlebell, and many others. Also degrees in physiology or kinesiology are a plus. Make sure you look up what the letters stand for. Some people will list things that are not certifications but are classes they took, or conferences they've been to, or list the name of organization they belong to as if they were letters to a certification. Sometimes people will list designations or degrees they have, look it up to see if it's in the world of fitness. People will list a designation in an unrelated field, but your assumption will be that their degree is related to fitness.
Some will tell you it's not about certifications but experience. There is some truth to that but at the same time would you trust your doctor if they only had 2 years of schooling total, never got their MD but has a lot of experience? If fitness truly is a science, than education does matter. Also a lack of seeking further accreditation is a sign that they are no longer up to date on current trends nor are they really curious or interested in learning more. This is when you get into people making up their own training science. Just because I don't like physics and no longer want to learn about it, doesn't mean I can go make up my own physics system. Experience though is very important in the trainer's ability to coach and motivate.
What is the "fat burning zone" that trainers often refer to?
Fat burning zone means nothing. It's often used because of the misunderstanding of the term. There's a lot of things trainers say that are based on myth, this being one. People think that when you are in this "zone," you burn more fat. This is not true. The fat burning zone relies on extended periods of low intensity exercise. The energy you use will be a form of carbs and fats, measure by calories. Well in the fat burning zone, you burn very little total calories. In the ratio of carbs and fat burned, you may have a high ratio of fat burned at this zone in comparison to high intensity exercise. In higher intensities, you burn more calories, and you also burn more fat. The ratio of fat compared to carbs burned though will be lower than in the fat burning zone. So for example in the fat burning zone, I can burn let's say 1 apple and 1 orange. 50% of the energy I burned was an orange. If I did a higher intensity work out, I would have burned 5 apples and 3 oranges. Which is 38% but I burned 2 more oranges than I did in the fat burning zone. So I burn more fat in higher intensity work outs. Fact. Not only that but you are burning more carbs, which may also later on turn into fat if left unchecked.
Best analogy is hibernation in animals. They live off their fat reserves. Get fat in the summer and sleep in winter. The reason they can survive so long without food is, they burn very little energy during this time because they are sleeping. Epitome of fat burning zone. Would you recommend sleeping as the best form of weight loss though?
Is there a difference between "cardio" and "aerobic"? If there is, what's the difference?
A term often used interchangeably but can sometimes mean 2 different things. Aerobic means you are expending energy in the presence of oxygen. Oxygen being the key factor. Cardio could mean cardiorespiratory, meaning the same thing as aerobic and based on the health of your lungs and your body's ability to send oxygen through its system. But most often they mean cardiovascular, meaning increasing your heart rate and the health of your vascular system.
How can people tell if they're doing enough exercise or exercising intensely enough?
You will see it in the results. If you train with intensity and frequency, then you are doing your job in the gym. You may however not be doing your job with your diet and your sleep. Especially on the weekends.
Why is it that, no matter how much cardio some people do, they still can't lose weight?
Weight loss has 3 factors, hormonal response, caloric burn, and metabolism. Your body's ability to burn calories is directly linked to how much muscle mass you have. If you have very little muscle mass, what are you really using to burn the calories? Just doing cardio would not be the most efficient method. Creating muscle mass first would be the better investment. Muscle burns calories just existing. It's why people who have a higher muscle mass percentage just burn more calories doing nothing. Muscle burns more calories than fat, you would be wise to take the extra time to build it up. It's why often times men have an easier time losing weight, because they have more muscle mass so it's easier to burn the calories. They are also more apt to lift weights than women are.
Hormones also signal your body to use fat as a fuel, and tells your body to speed up it's metabolism. This will be affected by sleep, mood, stress, diet, exercise, and frequency of exercise.
Is there an "ideal" time of day to work out?
It's really based on preference, but morning would be the most optimal time. It is prior to any stress, loss of energy, and a morning work out will keep your metabolism up for the rest of the day.
Is there any true benefit to warming up, cooling down, or stretching before or after exercising? If there is, why are these things important?
The benefits of those things are mainly in injury prevention and to minimize shock to your body. It may also help to get your mind ready for the work out to come. You should never static stretch prior to a work out but only after, instead opt for dynamic stretches or mobility drills. Never make your warm up too intense as well, it may ruin your strength for the actual work out and make your overall work out less productive. Why is injury prevention important? Well it's only important if you are planning to work out for an extended period of your life. If you don't mind hurting yourself by week 2, then go ahead and forget the mobility and stretches.
If you are training with a professional, is your diet still important?
Yes. Always. There is never a time your fuel source is not important.
It seems like there is a constant stream of conflicting nutrition information. How can we simplify our diet and move towards our health and fitness goals?
Start asking yourself, how were we genetically designed to eat? Humans survived and thrived better than every other species not because we are the fittest or strongest, but because we are the most efficient. So are you eating efficiently? For your stomach or blood or immune system or hormone? It's not good enough to eat with moderation or balance, you must be efficient. So what does that mean? I think that's a lifelong journey in discovery. But start with this, before you put anything in your mouth, even if it's a sports bar, ask yourself this, your genetics that took thousands of years to develop, does it know what this sports bar is? Is it even adapted to eat it? How long has that bar been around? How long have humans been around?
How important are the mental aspects in improving health and fitness?
Exercise is part of it, diet is a lot of it, lifestyle a huge part of it. Your mental approach is what brings it all together. Without a good mental game, it will all fall apart. Do you want to be the captain of your destiny or the pawn of fate? So where is your mental game then, is it strong or have you never thought about it?
About Coach Sam:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
WALK LIKE A COACH
Walking to my car, guy asked me where I train. I wasn't wearing any training paraphernalia. He said I carried myself like a coach.
HORMONAL VS. CALORIC WEIGHT LOSS
An article by Metabolic Effect on hormones, calorie loss, and the science behind it. Do not be caught in the caloric based trap!
"The problem with caloric weight loss is that it is indiscriminant. Cutting calories out of the diet and burning up energy on a treadmill may lead to weight loss, but there is no guarantee those pounds will be fat. After all, it is fat loss we want. So what determines whether we lose muscle or fat? The answer is our hormones." Read more.
Labels:
Articles,
Diet,
Health,
Resources,
Secret Training
Monday, March 5, 2012
WHY I DON'T LIKE GROUP TRAINING OR CLASSES
Saw this video and I wanted to like it because I am a martial artist but I don't. I love circuits but the forms are terrible, the likelihood of injury high, knee caving in during box jumps, that is not a proper power clean, nor is it even on bumper plates to do a power clean, and whats with all the bicep curls? You don't get hurt during competition, you get hurt before it. It just sometimes happens to get inflamed during competition.
WHY ARE LEGUMES NOT GOOD FOR US?
An article from Livestrong about the Paleo and legumes.
One problem with legumes just like with grains is they have lectin and other compounds that were produced by plants to fight off insects.
They also contain protease inhibitors and anti-nutrients which can prevent you from getting enough nutrients from your food.
Soy in particular has phytoestrogens which may affect estrogen levels in male and females.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
DOES FOOT FORM EXPLAIN RUNNING INJURIES?
The members of Harvard University’s men’s and women’s distance running squads are young, fast, fit, skinny, bright, disciplined and, without exception, dutiful. Every day during the cross-country and track seasons, they enter their mileage and pace into an online training Web site overseen by the team’s coaches and trainers.
They also, like most serious runners, get hurt with distressing frequency, often missing practice due to aching muscles or over-stressed bones. Each of those injuries, no matter how niggling, also gets duly reported and entered into the computer.
Meaning that these student athletes, in their high-achieving way, fashioned an excellent database through which to examine running-related injuries, as evidenced by a study published online last month in Medicine; Science in Sports; Exercise.
The study, for which researchers combed through four years’ worth of data about the Harvard runners, has produced the surprisingly controversial finding that how a person runs may affect whether he or she winds up hurt.
Running injuries are a topic of considerable interest to scientists in many disciplines, from biomechanics to evolutionary biology, as well as, of course, to runners. By most estimates, more than half of all runners, whether male or female, collegiate or long past, become injured every year.
But no one knows why so many runners get hurt, although a number of theories have been advanced, including the possibility that hard asphalt roads, lousy Western diets, too many miles, too few miles or high-tech running shoes cause or contribute to the problem.
But Adam I. Daoud, a graduate student in the Skeletal Biology Laboratory at Harvard and the lab’s director, Daniel Lieberman, an evolutionary biologist who co-wrote an influential 2004 paper suggesting that distance running guided the evolution of early man — with better runners earning more food and sex than plodders and passing along their genes — wondered if something simpler might be at work. They wondered whether how your foot hits the ground affects your injury risk.
Most of us who run nowadays strike the ground first with our heels, a pattern promoted by today’s well-cushioned running shoes. There’s suggestive evidence, however, including from Dr. Lieberman’s work, that early, unshod hunter-gatherers landed first on the balls of their feet. So, in recent years, some runners have decided that forefoot striking must be more “natural” and less likely to cause injuries.
But there has been no science to support that idea.
To look into the issue, Mr. Daoud, who had been on the cross-country team as an undergraduate, and Dr. Lieberman not only gained access to the team’s training database, they also gathered the team members and videotaped them.
No one is always a forefoot striker or a heel striker. Your form depends on many factors, including your speed, the terrain, whether you’re tired and so on. But most of us have a predominant strike pattern, and so it was with the 52 Harvard runners. Thirty-six, or 69 percent of them, were heel strikers, while 16, or 31 percent, were forefoot strikers. The proportions were similar regardless of gender.
More interesting was the distribution of injuries. About two-thirds of the group wound up hurt seriously enough each year to miss two or more training days. But the heel strikers were much more prone to injury, with a twofold greater risk than the forefoot strikers.
This finding, the first to associate heel striking with injury, is likely to fuel the continuing and not-always civil debate about whether barefoot running is better. (It hurts to hit the ground with your heel if you’re not wearing shoes.) But both Dr. Lieberman and Mr. Daoud, now a medical student at Stanford University, are quick to point out that their study did not in any way address the merits of going barefoot.
All of the Harvard runners wore shoes, and most, as Dr. Lieberman says, “wore different shoes every day of the week.” Some ran in well-cushioned shoes and became injured, while others did not. Likewise for those who usually ran in minimal racing flats. Some got hurt; some did not. And forefoot striking, over all, was not a panacea. Many of the forefoot strikers were felled by injuries.
But in general, those runners who landed on their heels were considerably more likely to get hurt, often multiple times during a year.
Does this mean that those of us who habitually heel-strike, as I do, should change our form? “If you’re not getting hurt,” Dr. Lieberman says, “then absolutely not. If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.”
But, says Mr. Daoud, who was himself an oft-injured heel-striker during his cross-country racing days, “if you have experienced injury after injury and you’re a heel-striker, it might be worth considering a change.” (If you’re unsure of your strike pattern, have a friend videotape you from the side as you run, he suggests, then use slow motion to watch how your foot hits the ground.)
If you do decide to reshape your stride, proceed slowly, he cautions. Many people who abruptly switch to barefoot running or a forefoot running form get hurt in the process, he says. The body’s tissues adapt to the forces generated by long-term heel striking. Change your form, and the forces will affect different parts of the leg, leading to soreness and, potentially, injury.
Try landing on the ball of your foot “for five minutes at first at the end of a run,” Mr. Daoud suggests. Work up to longer periods of forefoot landings as your body adjusts and only if you do not notice significant, continuing soreness.
In his own case, Mr. Daoud now runs consistently with a forefoot landing style, but the transition was not seamless. “I broke a metatarsal while running my first marathon after transitioning a bit too quickly and expecting a bit too much from my body too soon,” he says. So fair warning to those considering making the transition to forefoot landings: “Give your body time!” Read more.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
ANDREA TESTIMONIAL
"I did one on one training and boxing lessons with Coach Sam. It was by far the best experience I've ever had working out. He's a great person - not just a trainer but easily someone you come to really like and admire.
So, for those of you with the desire to get fit and the means (he's actually not that expensive, relatively speaking), I highly, highly recommend him."
So, for those of you with the desire to get fit and the means (he's actually not that expensive, relatively speaking), I highly, highly recommend him."
Labels:
Reviews
Friday, March 2, 2012
HYUN'S TESTIMONIAL
"In the past year, I have made a life decision to be healthier and happier. My goal started out small -it was to jog a mile nonstop. You might laugh at this, but for me it was a big deal and you can not imagine my pride and surprise when I did it." Read more.
Labels:
Reviews
HOW PIG PARTS MAKE THE WORLD TURN
A TED talk on some of the uses of pig parts. A follow up on the uses of cows. Whether you eat meat or not, you use animals.
HOW TRULY HARD IS IT TO BE VEGAN
Is it truly possible to live in a way where you harm no animals whatsoever? Just because you don't consume meat for consumption, does that mean you avoid any animal use? Here is an illustration on uses of cattle.
HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH ARSENIC IN RICE
The news that some rice-based foods are surprisingly high in arsenic has left rice lovers wondering how the heck we're to know what's safe to eat. Read more.
FREE PERSONAL TRAINING ASSESSMENT
The reason most people fail during exercise is because they don't assess prior to beginning a work out program. That's like trying to get in shape accidentally, or trying to get somewhere specific without any directions. A consultation and assessment most of the time is free, so take advantage of them.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
DISNEY CLOSES NEW ATTRACTION, OFFENDS OVERWEIGHT KIDS
"It's not exactly a secret that America's children are getting fatter, so Disney's Epcot theme park in Orlando decided to help tackle the problem head-on with a new attraction called Habit Heroes. Kids were invited to partake in activities like shooting hot dogs with broccoli spears, and defeating an obese villain named Leadbottom in a dance off". Read more.
Labels:
Getting Fat,
Health,
Resources
PERSONAL TRAINING CONSULTATION
The reason most people fail during exercise is because they don't assess prior to beginning a work out program. That's like trying to get in shape accidentally, or trying to get somewhere specific without any directions. A consultation and assessment most of the time is free, so take advantage of them.
REVIEW FROM ANDREW L.
"Coach Cindy is an incredibly motivational instructor both inside and outside of class. I work out almost daily and thought I was in shape, but after one kettlebell session with Cindy I knew I had a long way to go. Cindy's kettlebell method focuses on core strength, flexibility and balance - things I had little of. However, even after the first class I noticed my posture was improving - or rather I noticed how hunched over I must have been before Cindy's techniques set me straight.
Coach Cindy is of course not just limited to kettlebells, she'll customize the training experience to your needs. This means not only a focus on proper strength and balance, but nutritional advice too. She has taught me ways to change my workout and diet that I still use every day.
No matter what your fitness goals are, Cindy will make sure you get there". READ IT ON YELP.
Coach Cindy is of course not just limited to kettlebells, she'll customize the training experience to your needs. This means not only a focus on proper strength and balance, but nutritional advice too. She has taught me ways to change my workout and diet that I still use every day.
No matter what your fitness goals are, Cindy will make sure you get there". READ IT ON YELP.
Labels:
Reviews
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
DO I NEED PERSONAL TRAINING
If you are on this site, you must be asking yourself this question, do I need personal training?
Let me flip it around and ask you this question: Professional athletes need trainers, why don't you? In fact if you look at our results and numbers and record breakers, our athletes keep getting better and better yet the general population keeps getting worse. So why don't you need some form of professional training?
You might say, well the athlete has a lot loftier goals than I. Well that is true, but the athlete is already in the top 1% of the world and every athlete he competes against has the same goal. Your goals might be lower but you are also not in the same starting shape as the athlete. So it almost becomes a wash.
Now not every professional athlete will hire a trainer. Some try to go at it alone. A very small minority, and never in a team sport but usually in professional fighting. What happens to these fighters? They lose. A lot. Manny Pacquiao was not the pound for pound king until he hired Freddie Roach and Alex Ariza.
When you have no goals and want to work out to just work out or don't want to work out at all, then you really don't need a trainer. If you can't financially afford one, that is a different matter. Need and ability are two different issues but personal training prices can range from $20-$200 a session (higher the rate doesn't always indicate good training, they may use that because of their celebrity clientele and status as opposed to being a good fitness coach).
There is something called cognitive dissonance. This is where you have a belief but evidence shows you another truth and this causes incongruence and discomfort. So psychology people will avoid this by having a preconceived notion then finding information or interpreting information to back up their current belief instead of letting the evidence shape their belief. It's backwards and illogical.
So you can tell yourself you don't need a personal trainer, that you can do it on your own but the statistics, the evidence, and frankly for most of you, your own health says otherwise.
Not only that your trainers are your number 1 advocate and the only other person besides yourself who share in your goal.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
Technorati Tags: personal-trainer personal-training weight-loss fitness professional-coach
Let me flip it around and ask you this question: Professional athletes need trainers, why don't you? In fact if you look at our results and numbers and record breakers, our athletes keep getting better and better yet the general population keeps getting worse. So why don't you need some form of professional training?
You might say, well the athlete has a lot loftier goals than I. Well that is true, but the athlete is already in the top 1% of the world and every athlete he competes against has the same goal. Your goals might be lower but you are also not in the same starting shape as the athlete. So it almost becomes a wash.
Now not every professional athlete will hire a trainer. Some try to go at it alone. A very small minority, and never in a team sport but usually in professional fighting. What happens to these fighters? They lose. A lot. Manny Pacquiao was not the pound for pound king until he hired Freddie Roach and Alex Ariza.
When you have no goals and want to work out to just work out or don't want to work out at all, then you really don't need a trainer. If you can't financially afford one, that is a different matter. Need and ability are two different issues but personal training prices can range from $20-$200 a session (higher the rate doesn't always indicate good training, they may use that because of their celebrity clientele and status as opposed to being a good fitness coach).
There is something called cognitive dissonance. This is where you have a belief but evidence shows you another truth and this causes incongruence and discomfort. So psychology people will avoid this by having a preconceived notion then finding information or interpreting information to back up their current belief instead of letting the evidence shape their belief. It's backwards and illogical.
So you can tell yourself you don't need a personal trainer, that you can do it on your own but the statistics, the evidence, and frankly for most of you, your own health says otherwise.
Not only that your trainers are your number 1 advocate and the only other person besides yourself who share in your goal.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
Technorati Tags: personal-trainer personal-training weight-loss fitness professional-coach
Labels:
Articles,
Health,
Personal Trainers,
Thoughts
Monday, February 27, 2012
COACH AND FAN
One of my clients is a budding comedian. I asked if I could see her show. She asked why would I want to? I said because I am your coach, that automatically makes me your #1 fan.
Labels:
Articles,
Inspiration,
Pictures
TAKE YOUR TRAINING UP A NOTCH
You are in the gym. Already tired from the day. You are ready to turn it on Beast Mode. And once you do there is no turning back.
Labels:
Inspiration,
Pictures
Sunday, February 26, 2012
THIS IS WHY I DON'T LIKE BREAD
Another food creation our ancestors would have never imagined eating nor is our body prepared to eat. Looks either very scary or delicious based on who you ask. Is this going too far in gastronomology?
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Thursday, February 23, 2012
IS NEVER HAVING COOKED DANGEROUS?
I was thinking about this today. This is somewhat in jest but is it dangerous to have never cooked or prepared your own meal? I guess what I am saying is, is it dangerous to be spoiled?
I remember two instances.
Instance one. It was in college. First time experience for a lot of people to live on their own. Also living with others. So this girl I knew, she was hungry and looked in the fridge and saw some marinated meat. She started to eat it and asked her roommate why it tastes so weird?
Her roommate in shock and disgust said, because it's not cooked stupid. She immediately spat it out. She said how was she supposed to know? It was covered in sauce. And besides only food she ate was stuff at restaurants or something her mom just gave to her already prepared. She had never seen food prior to preparation before. Or that's what she told us anyway. It's college. So I can see that happening.
I also remember seeing a mom a few years ago at a restaurant. If you are in Los Angeles, it is quite the "foodie" capital where people are always trying new types of food. Well this mother with her toddler in his baby chair was a cute sight to behold at the restaurant. A mommy and me date. Cute. Kid was dressed really well, hair all done. The mom was fashionable, very hip, sun glasses, hair all did. Neat too, always making sure his face was clean.
So she ordered this soup called soon tofu. Korean dish, it also comes with raw eggs. The soup comes piping hot and will cook for a few minutes at your table. You crack the egg open and let it cook in the soup all the way. Delicious.
Anyhow this girl was also Korean. I know she had had soon tofu before. She knew what to order, didn't look at the menu. When it came, she wanted to share it with her son. So she took his rice bowl which was already filled with rice and cracked the raw egg on top of it. Then she started spooning the soup into the rice bowl and mixing it all up. The soup will cool too fast with the rice and with her mixing it all up, the egg will never have a chance to cook. Not only that but the bowl is too small, so it will never mix right. It was never intended to serve that purpose. I know what she was thinking. The soup is too hot. And the egg is the treat in the soup so instead of her eating it, she was going to give it to her son. Yeah I get that.
And she took the utmost care to not spill one bit of it. And she fed this raw egg gruel to her child. Wiping his lips. The way she fed him was very loving. You could tell her intentions were good. But it was OBVIOUS she has never cooked or prepared any food in her whole life and was risking giving her child salmonella. I have no idea how you can become a mom and be at that age.
I hope nothing happened to that kid. But these are actual instances that I personally witnessed where someone's health was at risk. So before you go out there and try to be the ultimate foodie and only care about food others prepare for you, learn to cook yourself. It's not only good for your health for these reasons, but its the best way to lose weight and eat healthy. Make it your damn self.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
I remember two instances.
Instance one. It was in college. First time experience for a lot of people to live on their own. Also living with others. So this girl I knew, she was hungry and looked in the fridge and saw some marinated meat. She started to eat it and asked her roommate why it tastes so weird?
Her roommate in shock and disgust said, because it's not cooked stupid. She immediately spat it out. She said how was she supposed to know? It was covered in sauce. And besides only food she ate was stuff at restaurants or something her mom just gave to her already prepared. She had never seen food prior to preparation before. Or that's what she told us anyway. It's college. So I can see that happening.
I also remember seeing a mom a few years ago at a restaurant. If you are in Los Angeles, it is quite the "foodie" capital where people are always trying new types of food. Well this mother with her toddler in his baby chair was a cute sight to behold at the restaurant. A mommy and me date. Cute. Kid was dressed really well, hair all done. The mom was fashionable, very hip, sun glasses, hair all did. Neat too, always making sure his face was clean.
So she ordered this soup called soon tofu. Korean dish, it also comes with raw eggs. The soup comes piping hot and will cook for a few minutes at your table. You crack the egg open and let it cook in the soup all the way. Delicious.
Anyhow this girl was also Korean. I know she had had soon tofu before. She knew what to order, didn't look at the menu. When it came, she wanted to share it with her son. So she took his rice bowl which was already filled with rice and cracked the raw egg on top of it. Then she started spooning the soup into the rice bowl and mixing it all up. The soup will cool too fast with the rice and with her mixing it all up, the egg will never have a chance to cook. Not only that but the bowl is too small, so it will never mix right. It was never intended to serve that purpose. I know what she was thinking. The soup is too hot. And the egg is the treat in the soup so instead of her eating it, she was going to give it to her son. Yeah I get that.
And she took the utmost care to not spill one bit of it. And she fed this raw egg gruel to her child. Wiping his lips. The way she fed him was very loving. You could tell her intentions were good. But it was OBVIOUS she has never cooked or prepared any food in her whole life and was risking giving her child salmonella. I have no idea how you can become a mom and be at that age.
I hope nothing happened to that kid. But these are actual instances that I personally witnessed where someone's health was at risk. So before you go out there and try to be the ultimate foodie and only care about food others prepare for you, learn to cook yourself. It's not only good for your health for these reasons, but its the best way to lose weight and eat healthy. Make it your damn self.
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
CHILDHOOD OBESITY AND CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISING.
Is it the only way to get the conversation started?
Labels:
Getting Fat,
Health,
Resources,
Videos
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
GIVE UP SOMETHING GOOD FOR LENT THIS YEAR
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook and Pinterests.
Labels:
Inspiration,
Pictures
Obesity The Silent Killer
AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION BEATS A POUND OF CURE
It's so much easier to deal with problems before they arise. Get it on the front end, before you have to try to deal with it on the back end. I have a friend who works in the ER as an EMT, she is also a personal trainer. She got into being an EMT for the same reason she originally got into personal training, to help people. She told me that in the ER it feels like it's an endless uphill battle and most of the people in there don't belong there. That somewhere in their life they could have prevented whatever brought them into the ER.
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Monday, February 20, 2012
Realistic Universal Healthcare
This is healthcare that will absolutely work for everyone no matter what political party affiliation!
Paul R. Testimonial
"Before Sam Y started All Out Effort Personal Training, he needed someone to test out his various exercises, diet plans, and be on the receiving end of his various punches and submission holds. From early 2004, I was that guy. Was it tough? Absolutely. Did I want to quit? All the time. Were there days when I wanted to key Sam's car? Every day.
But because of his early dedication to my continued fitness and personal goals, I was able to achieve them and much more. He's the kind of coach that Hollywood loves to recreate time and time again: He'll work you like a dog but pushes you to achieve your potential with a few wise words during intense training montages.
His knowledge in the field continually gets better and shows no sign of deteriorating." Read it on Yelp.
Labels:
Reviews
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Things Personal Trainers Always Get Wrong Part 1
Here are some common things I always see personal trainers get wrong. Check back for more videos on how to navigate the world of fitness.
Labels:
Articles,
Personal Trainers,
Thoughts,
Videos
All Out Effort Donating To A Good Cause
I'm donating 4 sessions to a very worthy cause. It's to the Needlework Guild of America who donate clothing and linens to many causes. One of the perks though is that I get to go to their annual benefit dinner hosted by Andy Richter!
I wonder how my brand of fitness will do with this high end crowd where things like yachting trips, private wine tasting, and one on one pilates training are also on the auction block. We shall see...
About the Author:
Sam Y. is a Master Personal Trainer, Coach, Certified Nutritionist, Performance Enhancement Specialist, Corrective Enhancement Specialist, Pilates and Yoga instructor, and holds multiple certifications. He is also an avid Martial Artist, training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Kickboxing, Boxing, and MMA. He is also the author of the popular fitness blog All Out Effort as well as the popular martial arts blog Inner BJJ. You can find him in the Los Angeles area personal training his clients, or at home annoying his wife, or on Facebook at his personal fitness page.
The American Diet
"The United States has experienced a major health transition in the last 150 years, which has included an increase in the prevalence of obesity, diabetes and coronary heart disease. As these conditions are heavily influenced by food choices, it is important to understand how the American diet has changed over this time period. This talk will describe qualitative and quantitative changes in American food habits that may be relevant to modern disease patterns."
Dr. Stephan Guyenet from the University of Washington gives a talk about the American diet at Tedx (independently organized TED event) given at Harvard Law.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Bob Harper Meets Crossfit
How do you feel between the marriage of Bob Harper and Crossfit? Is this a good thing or a bad thing for this fledgling fitness movement? Is Bob just jumping on a popular bandwagon or is Crossfit trying to capitalize on his star status? Will this hurt their image or help?
Labels:
Videos
Friday, February 17, 2012
Change Your Life
I sent some reading material to a client a few days ago regarding health. I asked them if they had read it. They said they didn't have time... I noticed the client had gotten their hair done in this time. I asked how long it took to do their hair? They said 5 or more hours.
I said, "you have 5 hours for your hair?"
"You know what I could do with 5 hours," I continued?
He said, "what?"
I said, "I CAN CHANGE MY WHOLE F'N LIFE IN 5 HOURS."
Please share.
I said, "you have 5 hours for your hair?"
"You know what I could do with 5 hours," I continued?
He said, "what?"
I said, "I CAN CHANGE MY WHOLE F'N LIFE IN 5 HOURS."
Please share.
Labels:
Articles,
Inspiration,
Pictures
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
How The Paleo Diet Cured Dr. Terry Wahls Of MS
An important video about health, food, diet, and how we were evolved to eat.
Labels:
Articles,
Diet,
Experimentation,
Health,
Inspiration,
Videos
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Are We Supposed To Be Vegan, Vegetarian, Carnivore, Omnivore, Herbivore, Or Paleo
So What Are We Supposed To Eat?
(Disclaimer - What you are about to read may annoy you or make you angry. These are my opinions and by no means a scientific doctrine.)
It seems now everyone uses evolution to preach their eating preferences. There are many arguments on both sides; whether we are an omnivore or an herbivore (vegan or vegetarian or raw).
Both sides will agree we are not meant to eat purely meat. The argument then stems from whether we should eat some meat, or no meat at all.
I think you should eat any way you please. If your reason for eating a certain way is evolutionary or based on what you think science claims and this is what you preach to others, and not because of any moral, religious, cultural, or preferential reason, then I have to clear the air.
Herbivore Argument
On that side people will argue that we were never designed to eat meat. The comparisons are drawn with carnivores to prove this point. This is already a weak comparison, comparing us to a group that only eats meat when even the most meat loving human will only meat less than a third of the time. So a group that only eats meat compared to a group that sometimes eats meat is like comparing apples to oranges.
Why don't we have fangs and claws? Why don't we have the stomach acid of carnivores? Because man evolved without needing those things. Man had the superior intellect, ability to use tools, and fire. All of which were needed for survival. Man originally only needed to eat, sleep, and procreate. We didn't initially need tools to build cars and write books. Tools had to somehow help us live, help us get food, help us hunt, keep us warm. Now tools are about convenience and entertainment but it wasn't always the case.
We may not have the stomachs of carnivores, but we also don't have the stomachs of herbivores either. If we did we would have multichambered stomachs or highly developed digestive sacs.
What about our jaws? We can move it side to side like other herbivores. Yes we were designed to eat lots of vegetable matter. But we also weren't designed to chew cud for hours, vomit it up and chew it again or be able to poop out highly nutritious pellets that we would eat again to absorb more nutrients.
We also didn't need to have jaws of lions because we became the apex predator due to our intellect.
Our small intestines are much longer than carnivores, and more like the herbivore. But if you measure us from mouth to anus, the length of it would put us somewhere between a lion and a cow. Right near the middle as far as length, like an omnivore should be.
What's also interesting is though we don't have the ability to break down meat like a lion, we can't break down cellulose either like a horse or a cow. If we could break it down like that, there would be no need for a juicing craze. We would be able to break down all that cellulose and extract the nutrients on our own.
But the whole point of why its so popular, and extremely popular in the vegan and vegetarian communities is because of that very fact, that the human body can't break down the nutrients so we need to juice it out instead. Juicing is natural they say, its what we were meant to do. Except we never evolved with juicers and we were evolved to eat the plant in whatever form and combination it came in. We evolved right along with the plants we ate. We go and study native diets to see how they fight off diseases, and the foods they eat in what combination. Then we use reductionist science to get the good stuff and put it into a drink. How is that anything like eating a native diet? We need a blender and a juicer and chemists to get back closer to how the natives ate? Its like reducing an orange to a vitamin C pill and telling you it's just as good as an orange. Certified nutritionists will actually use that logic with clients and sell them on cleanses and pills.
Its totally contrary. To say we can't break down cellulose so we need to juice, and then say we need to juice and eat vegan because we were only meant to eat plants and not meat. If we were designed to only eat plants, why do we need to juice to break down the cellulose? Why can't our stomachs break it down like every other herbivore can? Why do we need the juicer to extract all the nutrients when we were meant to only eat plants? Its completely contradictory. Their argument for why we should juice is the same argument why we aren't good herbivores. The evolutionary justification of this diet does a terrible job explaining why you should do it. They should just stick with it being good for your health. Or the best reason, it truly is the best way to lower toxicology. Not the best in macro-nutrients but good in cleaning your system. Use a holistic reasoning. Not a genetic one, because that reasoning that will prove you wrong. I don't understand why people who eat a certain way feel the need to explain it with evolution. Don't. It's totally the wrong talking point. There are much better ways to build your case. (I think personal training so many lawyers has been affecting my writing style.)
What about chimpanzees? They mostly eat plants. Mostly. Even they will go out of their way to get meat. That's not the counter argument though. The counter argument is, as close as chimps are to us, we are much closer genetically to the neanderthal. The neanderthal was the predecessor of man who mostly ate meat. Which also isn't efficient, because any food source can become scarce. There is about 6 million years of evolutionary difference between us and the chimpanzee as well. Things change.
Why do native tribes do so poorly now in the hunt when their tools are more advanced than the stone tools used in the past? Well why are there so many extinct animals? Modern versions of early tribes like Pygmies don't have the same abundance of animals to hunt because wild animals are now scarce to begin with.
Scarcity and Thrifty Genes
Actually we were designed specifically for scarcity. We were never meant to be able to eat a whole lot like some animals. We could eat a small amount and be able to do a great deal of activity off of that little amount of energy. It's why we gain weight so easily now, because humans were never designed for a world where food is unlimited. Those thrifty genes that kept us alive during famine, is what's killing us now with obesity. Your body needs less food than you think.
What about "The China Study?" A lot of criticism has been written about this book already so I won't recap it all. And yes more vegetables is good for you. My dad currently has cancer and one of the first things we did was get him off all the sugar and processed carbs and get him eating more fresh vegetables. Denise Minger at Raw Food: SOS does a much better job than I can breaking it down. She is by no means a hardcore meat lover. Quite the contrary, she is a raw foodist. One of the problems with "The China Study" is hand picking statistics and data.
Another good read on another site that is aligned with vegetarians is the International Vegetarian Union. They have a great article on What Did Our Ancestors Eat. The site promotes vegetarianism and veganism throughout the world. Here is the first line of the article:
"You sometimes hear the argument that humans are "naturally vegetarian" or that they evolved as vegetarians. This is somewhat dangerous to pursue as the scientific evidence all indicates that we are omnivores, i.e., we can survive on a wide variety of plant and animal foods"
It is completely fine to be a vegetarian or vegan like I said. The problem I have with it is the use of evolution to justify it. In the above article, though they outline how our ancestors ate meat and evolved to eat meat, we would all still probably be better off if we ate more plant matter or a completely plant matter diet.
To say we should eat this way, I can respect. So eat that way. Just don't justify it with science. Justify it with preference. Actually you shouldn't have to justify it at all. Your choice is your choice. But to say we always ate this way (just because that's how you choose to eat now), is just plain ill-informed and ill-conceived.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





































